Public Policy and the Lottery

The lottery is a gambling game in which people pay to have the chance to win prizes, such as cash or merchandise. Prizes may be awarded to players who match a random set of numbers or symbols drawn by machines, or to those who purchase whole tickets. The game has broad public support and is a popular source of entertainment.

In states with lotteries, about 60 percent of adults report playing at least once a year. Many players are regulars, purchasing tickets at convenience stores or other outlets for the games on a frequent basis. The games are also widely promoted, often using highly slick advertising campaigns that critics say mislead consumers about the odds of winning (the likelihood that the jackpot will be won by any particular ticket, for example, is frequently exaggerated); inflate the value of money won (the vast majority of prize amounts are paid out over 20 years, with inflation and taxes dramatically eroding the actual amount received); and otherwise promote a game that can be addictive and harmful to some people.

State lotteries typically grow quickly after being established, then level off and sometimes even decline, requiring a continual influx of new games to maintain or increase revenues. This growth-and-boredom dynamic is a clear example of how the piecemeal nature of public policymaking tends to make it difficult for lottery officials to establish and sustain a consistent and comprehensive policy for their industry.

When state governments first established lotteries, they did so primarily in response to demands for more revenue, typically for education and other public programs. Lottery supporters have argued that the games are an attractive option because they allow people to spend money voluntarily for a public purpose without raising taxes or cutting other public services. This argument is particularly effective in times of economic stress, when it can be used to counter fears about state budget cuts or tax increases.

As time goes on, the debate around lottery policy has moved away from the general desirability of gambling and toward more specific features of lottery operations, such as the problem of compulsive gamblers and the regressive effects of lotteries on poorer communities. But this shift in debate has also been driven by the fact that lottery officials must constantly innovate to introduce new games and retain their current market share, a function that may work at cross-purposes with the lottery’s larger public purposes.

For example, a state’s decision to promote new instant scratch-off games can be seen as a way to attract players from lower-income neighborhoods. But these same instant games can have a regressive impact on those communities, as they provide less to low-income families than traditional lottery games do. The bottom line is that, despite the rhetoric from lottery officials, state lotteries have evolved into businesses with a major focus on maximizing profits. As a result, the lotteries have become less and less oriented to public service. This trend can be observed in a wide range of areas, from public health and social services to highway construction and prison reform.

You may also like